Kevin Boudreau

Assistant Professor, Strategy

London Business School

kboudreau@london.edu

 

ACADEMIC POSITIONS

 

LONDON BUSINESS SCHOOL Assistant Professor, Department of Strategy and International Management, London United Kingdom, 2009-

 

HECPARIS SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT Assistant Professor, Department of Strategy and Business Policy, Jouy-en-Josas France, 2006-present

 

EDUCATION

 

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Sloan School of Management, Cambridge USA

Ph.D., Management (Strategy, Economics Track)

Thesis: How Open Should an Open System Be?

Advisors: Rebecca Henderson (MIT-Sloan), Michael Cusumano (MIT-Sloan), Marc Rysman (Boston University, Economics)

 

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO, Economics Dept – Toronto, Canada

MA in Economics

 

UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO – School of Engineering - Waterloo, Canada

B.A.Sc. Engineering, minor in Management Science

 

NBER Mini-Course, Econometrics, 2007

 

 

RESEARCH

 

Dissertation: How Open Should an Open System Be? : Essays on Mobile Computing

“Systems” goods—such as computers, telecom networks, and automobiles—are made up of mul- tiple components. This dissertation comprises three esssays that study the decisions of system innovators in mobile computing to “open” development of their systems to outside suppliers and the implications of doing so.

 

Opening the Platform vs. Opening the Complementary Good? The Effect on Product Innovation in Handheld Computing

(conditional acceptance, Management Science)

Some open strategies involve giving up control over a core technology platform. Others involve encouraging independent contributors to develop mix-and-matchable components. While these approaches often go hand-in-hand, here I argue they should relate to different objectives, instruments and economic mechanisms. This paper presents evidence on how opening the platform and complementary development related to development rates in a panel data set on handheld computing systems (1990-2004). The analysis shows that the relationship qualitatively differed depending on the approach to openness that was pursued. The central econometric concern is to purge estimates of several possible sources of endogeneity bias. While in principle opening may produce either an increase or decrease in innovation, in this context opening complementary development positively related to device development rates. It resulting in up to five-times acceleration of development rates. Open licensing of complementors had the greatest effect, with intermediate liberalness of licensing associated with fastest rates. Sharing technology with complementors led to small, incremental effects above and beyond this. Reducing control held by the platform owner or allowing outsiders to contribute to platform development related to much smaller, mostly insignificant effects (on the order of 10-20%).

 

Competition and Modular Innovation: Evidence from an “App Store” on Variety and Quality

(R&R, Organization Science)

We now have considerable theory to suggest there are benefits of having large numbers of suppliers innovating in markets for modular components. In this article, I empirically study how adding suppliers affected variety and quality in a quintessential example, the thousands of third-party applications software developers in handheld computing (1999-2004). I estimate causal effects by exploiting changes in the labor market for software developers. I find that adding suppliers increased the number of varieties available. At the same time, adding suppliers had a net effect of slowing down the advance of quality, in terms of the release of new versions. This retarding effect might have been worthwhile had added suppliers contributed useful hit products, at least once in a while. But, successive cohorts released less compelling products on average, while also generating less variation than earlier-entering cohorts. I use these results to better understand how precisely innovation works in cases of modular components, and how it may sometimes function differently from that in more traditional industries

                                                

How to Manage Outside Innovation: “Communities” or “Markets” of External Innovators? with K. Lakhani (Harvard)
Sloan Management Review 2009

Of course, the fundamental concept of “open innovation”  -- in the sense of relying on outsiders both as a source of ideas and as a means to commercialize them -- is hardly new, but companies have struggled with precisely how to open up their product development to the external world. For starters, many executives have little idea how to motivate and manage outside innovation. Specifically, should external innovators be organized as a collaborative community or as a competitive market? From our research, we have identified three critical issues that managers should take into account when making that decision. Specifically, the discussion must look at: 1) the type of innovation that will be shifted to external innovators, 2) the motivations of those individuals and 3) the nature of the platform business model.

 

Platform Rules: Multi-Sided Platforms as Regulators, with A. Hagiu (Harvard)

in Gawer, A. (ed) (2009), Platforms, Markets and Innovation, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, US: Edward Elgar.

This paper provides a basic conceptual framework for interpreting non-price instruments used by multi-sided platforms (MSPs) by analogizing MSPs as "private regulators" who regulate access to and interactions around the platform. We present evidence on Facebook, TopCoder, Roppongi Hills and Harvard to document the "regulatory" role played by MSPs. We find MSPs use nuanced combinations of legal, technological, informational and other instruments (including price-setting) to implement desired outcomes. Non-price instruments were very much at the core of MSP strategies.

 

Racing and Searching in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis with K. Lakani (Harvard) and N. Lacetera (CWRU)
(R&R Management Science)

A central concern in designing innovation contests is the number of competing solvers that should be admitted. We show that traditional concerns about diminished incentives with large numbers of contest participants may be over-stated, at least when innovation involves uncertain search. Using a unique data set on the solution of 645 software coding contests over a six year period, we find that adding solvers to a contest activates two sets of mechanisms, (1) a negative incentive or racing effect, whereby greater rivalry reduces the effort expended by individual solvers, and (2) a parallel search effect whereby a greater number of solvers advances innovation by broadening the search for solutions. We show that the former effect dominates for less uncertain problems, the latter effect for more uncertain problems. Our findings emphasize the importance of problem type when designing innovation contests and open innovation systems.

 

Governing the Creatives: Field Experimental Evidence on the Role of Worker Sorting in Driving Innovative Performance with K. Lakani (Harvard)

In this paper we present novel field experimental evidence to show that individuals have different preferences for cooperative and competitive institutions for innovation---and these preferences have large, economically significant performance, implications. In the experiment, individuals could choose between a competitive and a cooperative regime to solve computational-engineering problem faced by NASA’s Space Life Sciences Directorate. The experiment mimicked “open innovation” institutional regimes where individuals can participate in either competitive or cooperative problem solving with both pecuniary and non-pecuniary reward structures. Here we compare the performance of individuals who chose to be in the competitive regime versus those that were assigned to the regime, controlling for their skill level. First we find that those who were given the choice of institutional regime performed significantly better and exerted more effort than those that were assigned to compete. Second we find that the presence of pecuniary rewards resulted in better performance and more effort. Third we find that the impact of choice on performance and effort is equivalent to- and sometimes greater than the impact of pecuniary rewards, showing the importance of to selection and sorting for innovation.

 

 

 

SELECTED OTHER  PROJECTS

 

Complimentary Complements? Two-Sided Markets with Free Goods and Suppliers who Don't get Paid with Lars Bo Jeppessen (CBS)

 

Field Experiments in Open Innovation Software Development for National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) 50th anniversary of The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity

 

 

CASES

 

"Palm (A): The Debate on Licensing Palm’s OS (1997)." Harvard Business  School Case 708-514. (with R. Casadesus-Masanell, Harvard Business  School, and Jordan Mitchell)

"Palm (B): 2001." HBS Supplement 708-515.  (with R. Casadesus-Masanell, Harvard, and Jordan Mitchell)

"Palm (C): 2005." HBS Supplement 708-516. (with R. Casadesus-Masanell, Harvard, and Jordan Mitchell)

"Palm (D): Epilogue as of 2008." HBS Supplement 708-517. (with R. Casadesus-Masanell, Harvard, and Jordan Mitchell)

 

RESEARCH ASSISTANTSHIPS AND OTHER RESEARCH EXPERIENCE

 

Demand and Supply of Debt and Equity for Korean Firms. Olivier Blanchard and Simon Johnson, 2002

Information Technology Investment, Organizational Capital and Productivity. Erik Brynjolfsson, 2002

Several dozen publications on economics and strategy in global telecommunications industry, 1999-2001

 

TEACHING

 

Courses

Strategic Management, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010  (evaluated as “exceptional”)

Advanced Strategy Concepts: Innovation, New Ventures and Industry Change, 3-day course, 2007, 2009

PhD Empirical Methods 2007, 2010

 

Teaching Assistantships and Tutorial Lectureships

Strategic Management (Masters), Ezra Zuckerman, MIT Sloan, 2006

The Business of Software (Masters), Michael Cusumano, MIT Sloan, 2005

Technology Strategy (Masters), Rebecca Henderson, MIT Sloan, 2005

Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship (Sloan Fellows), Michael Cusumano, MIT Sloan, 2004

Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship (Masters), MBAs, Rebecca Henderson, MIT Sloan, 2004

 

INVITED PRESENTATIONS AND CONFERENCES

 

2010 Academy of Management, Platforms Symposium

2010 CRES Conference on the Foundations of Business Strategy

2010 Darden Entrepreneurship & Innovation Conference

2010 NESTA Open Innovation Research Roundtable

2010 Academy of Management,

 

2009 Dartmouth University

2009 Carnegie Mellon University

2009 IESE

2009 IE Business School

2009 Academy of Management: Innovation and Competition; Strategy and Business Models

2009 American Economics Association (AEA) Meetings: Exploring the Sources of Innovation: Recent Developments

 

2008 REER Conference, Georgia Tech

2008 Strategic Management Society, Sorbonne

2008 Sorbonne, Workshop on the Theory of the Firm

2008 Meeting of Recipients of Microsoft Grants for Research on Digital Platforms

2008 Platforms, Markets and Innovation, Imperial College

2008 London Business School, Sumantra Ghoshal Conference

2008 Wharton Technology Mini-Conference

2008 Ottawa University, Telfer School of Management

2008 London Business School – Strategy Department Seminar

2008 HBS – TOM Seminar

2008 Imperial College  – Strategy and Innovation Seminar

 

2007 Free and Open Source Software Workshop, Nice France

2007 User Innovation Workshop, CBS and MIT

2007 Academy of Management – Competing Through Business Design & Tech Change and Tech Strategy

2007 Atlanta Competitive Advantage Conference

2007 Center for Research on Economics and Strategy (CRES), Olin School of Business, Washington University

2007 Wharton Technology Mini-Conference

2007 International Industrial Organization Conference

2007 Sorbonne, Theoretical Analysis of Organizations and Markets

2007 IDEI Economics of Software and Internet Industries

 

2006 HBS Strategy Conference

2006 Modularity and Open Innovation, Practitioners and Researchers Exchange Workshop, Bocconi University

2006 Ronald Coase Institute Workshop on Institutional Analysis

2006 Annual conference for the International Society for Institutional Economics (ISNIE)

2006 International J. A. Schumpeter Society 11th ISS Conference: Innovation, competition and growth (Schumpeter2006)

2006 Atlanta Competitive Advantage Conference (ACAC)

2006 Vanderbilt University, Owen School of Business

2006 McGill University, Desautels School of Management

2006 HEC Paris School of Management

2006 INSEAD

2006 Ohio State University, Fisher School of Business

2006 Melbourne Business School

 

2005 NBER Productivity seminar

2005 Consortium on Cooperation and Competitiveness at University of California Berkeley

2005 MIT Organizational Economics Lunch

 

2002, 2003, 2004 Sloan Strategy Doctoral Seminar

 

SERVICE

 

Reviewing

Management Science, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Organization Science, Research Policy, Strategic Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Journal of the Association of Information Systems, California Management Review, Sloan Management Review, DRUID conference on Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Strategic Management Society, Academy of Management Meetings – TIM & BPS (Best Reviewer Award 2007), Administrative Science Quarterly, Information Systems Research

 

Other Service

Roundtable leader on Governance at European Academy of Management Doctoral Consortium, 2007

Organizer of HEC Strategy Department Seminar, 2007

HEC Masters thesis advisor, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009

HEC Strategy Hiring committee, 2006, 2007

Co-organizer of Sumantra Goshal Strategy Conference, Innovation, Entrepreneurship & Strategy Track, 2009

 

AWARDS & HONORS

 

RAMD Research Grant (15,000 GBP)

Sponsorship from M-Lab to fund TopCoder competitions (15,000 GBP)

Small honorarium and paper selected by National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) for 50th anniversary conference in honor of "The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity"

Invited Microsoft Research Grant ($50,000) 2007

Best Reviewer Award, Academy of Management, Business Policy and Strategy Division

Paris Chamber of Commerce Competitive Research Grant for Research in Media Platforms ($40,000) 2006

Stewart, Gerrity, and Wilson Fellowships 2003-2005

MIT Presidential Fellow, PhD Program

First Class, University of Toronto Economics

University of Waterloo Dean’s Honors

University of Waterloo Undergraduate Research Scholarship

Second place, Manufacturing Project “Semiconductor Manufacturing”

First place, Mechanical Engineering Design Project

Engineering Research Excellence, Bell Northern Research

University of Waterloo Entrance Scholarship

 

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

 

I currently act in an advisory role in the course of conducting my research. Prior positions include the following:

 

THE ECONOMIST INTELLIGENCE UNIT Telecoms, IT, & Media Division (Pyramid Research), UK, USA

Director of Research

Director of Research, Western Europe

 

QUALCOMM, Inc., USA, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico

Senior Manager (Contracting and M&A)

Manager (Large-Scale Infrastructure Business Development)

 

BRAXTON ASSOCIATES, Strategy Consultants, Americas Media & Telecoms, Canada

Associate

Business Analyst

 

NORTEL NETWORKS, Canada

Intern, Business Systems Analysis (studied systems across Ontario manufacturing, marketing and sales system, interviewed 110 people)

Intern, Microchip Fab Engineer (statistical analysis of performance in semiconductor manufacturing)

Intern, Thermal and Multi-Level Physical Design Engineering Research (experimental study on ‘Non-Contact Cooling’)

 

CANADIAN SPACE AGENCY

Intern, System Engineer (Canadarm space robotic arm project)

 

OTHER

 

Affiliations

Academy of Management, BPS and TIM divisions

American Economics Association

Industrial Organization Society

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

 

Languages

English, conversational French and Spanish

 

Personal

In isolated moments, with time on my hands: cycling Vancouver-San Diego; cycling Paris-Bordeaux, Lisbon-Seville; New York City Marathon; running San Diego-Tijuana; Hanover triathlon; road trip across America; travel in Central and Latin America; fly fishing, outdoors and nature; volunteering in youth programs in Guatemala, Mexico; tutoring math and music

 

REFERENCES

 

Rebecca Henderson, MIT-Sloan, rhenders@mit.edu

Michael Cusumano, MIT-Sloan, cusumano@mit.edu

Marc Rysman, Boston University, Economics Dept, mrysman@bu.edu

Frank Matthewson, University of Toronto, Economics Dept, frankm@uchass.utoronto.ca